Monday, January 8, 2018

Political Funding -PDD

Political Funding

Let’s first accept that Politics is a legitimate activity, as it helps organize the life of citizens, saving them time, effort, accidents, injustices and conflicts. Otherwise, people will act and have acted in the past tribally resorting to the law of jungle, driven by instinct and arbitrariness, fighting and killing.
Therefore, the political structures must be supported individually and collectively. 

In the current scenario it is incumbent upon the political parties as well to convince the Citizens that they are primarily working to fulfill that mandate. 
Arguably, the citizens have to proactively convey their concerns and issues to their political representatives and seek to influence public policies.  Citizen Participation has to be much more than just voting-including financial support.

Given the above backdrop our laws must consider Political Organizations as Socially relevant Institutions. In some ways, the Political Parties are treated on the same levels as NGOs and Charitable Organizations and Trusts. However the disclosure requirements are not as rigorous 

Since the Political Parties are charged with the responsibility of developing Vision and Strategy for whole of the Country, these may be treated above NGOs and trusts: They develop policy which is akin to “research and development”

Therefore, the following steps are suggested – i.e. to get the donors and political parties out of the perverse addiction to ‘black money’. It is axiomatic that a large part of the political funding comes from businesses /corporates: 

1)      Political Funding is currently allowed as a legitimate expenditure by corporates, i.e. 100% of the donation is charged to P&L.
2)      Allow a deduction of 200% as “Policy development Deduction”
3)      This additional deduction will encourage the corporates to weather the adverse consequences and/or develop strategies to manage the competing political forces.  
4)      A case has been made out for State Funding of elections/ political parties. Well, this is a step in that direction; state funds Rs 30 for every Rs 100 collected/ attracted by a political entity thru its efforts/ attractiveness to the donors.
5)      Commence placing easy disclosure requirements on Political parties, and ratchet them up annually to achieve full disclosures in say 10 years.    


We will possibly achieve a reasonably clean and transparent political funding system and inflict a hefty blow ( I wish it was a death blow) on the black economy- in 10 years.  

Monday, January 1, 2018

New Year –New Beginning


Fun and Puns 

Rahul’s coming of age augurs well for the Indian Public Life. Humour, in its many forms and avatars, seems to be inching towards center stage. His tweet including the videos : 




Dear Mr Jaitlie - thank you for reminding India that our PM never means what he says or says what he means. #BJPLies
Click on the link below and see the videos >>


Delicious !!

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Politics of "Bans"-Musings -1

Bans are Slothful Governance  

Our political and social leaders continue to use Bans and Prohibitions even in the face of strong evidence of their ineffectiveness and in many cases bad and vicious outcomes.
Banning or prohibiting is politically and administratively easy; a stroke of pen literally, in response to pressure from any righteous group large enough to carry some political weight.

Our leaders are savvy politicians. The bans and prohibitions are useful and easy tools in the scramble for moral high ground, beneficial in electoral politics. And also help  to draw the attention away from their own failings and misdeeds.

 However, enforcing bans and prohibitions takes much administrative and managerial capacity and energy. The outcomes are questionable and we as a society keep lurching from one ban to the next without any succor.  


In addition many forces- largely the underground which is fundamentally inimical to the society are let loose. 
To confront and control ganglands evermore admin capacity and energy is expended. We generate a vicious cycle- a downward spiral. 

Clearly, bans and prohibitions don't work; at the minimum, do not achieve the stated objectives.

Is there a better way? Surely methods can be devised for better social and political and even economic ends.

We will have to analyze, understand and re-state the objectives sought to be achieved by of Bans and Prohibitions.