Bans are Slothful Governance
Our political and social leaders continue to use Bans and Prohibitions
even in the face of strong evidence of their ineffectiveness and in many cases bad
and vicious outcomes.
Banning or prohibiting is politically and administratively
easy; a stroke of pen literally, in response to pressure from any righteous
group large enough to carry some political weight.
Our leaders are savvy politicians. The bans and prohibitions
are useful and easy tools in the scramble for moral high ground, beneficial in
electoral politics. And also help to
draw the attention away from their own failings and misdeeds.
However, enforcing bans and prohibitions takes much
administrative and managerial capacity and energy. The outcomes are
questionable and we as a society keep lurching from one ban to the next without
any succor.
In addition many forces- largely the underground which is
fundamentally inimical to the society are let loose.
To confront and control ganglands evermore admin capacity and energy is expended. We generate a vicious cycle- a downward spiral.
Clearly, bans and prohibitions don't work; at the minimum,
do not achieve the stated objectives.
Is there a better way? Surely methods can be devised for better
social and political and even economic ends.
We will have to analyze, understand and re-state the
objectives sought to be achieved by of Bans and Prohibitions.